[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make dist fixes
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: make dist fixes |
Date: |
07 Feb 2002 21:44:26 -0700 |
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:
>> I just checked in a set of fixes to help get make dist to work. I've
>> run into a problem with the generated Makefiles that comes from one of
>> the auto* tools.
Brian> Dove into automake and configure tonight and solved this little
Brian> mystery. Essentially the check for what to put in
Brian> @am__include@ is only done as part of something previously
Brian> included only when using --enable-jni because of one of the
Brian> checks for a compiler or something. I've moved the 'if'
Brian> statement down a bit in configure.in to fix this.
Thanks for looking at this.
We're aware of the problem. Every conditional you use must always be
declared -- running AM_CONDITIONAL in an `if' or something in
configure will (could) generate output that confuses make.
In the CVS automake we've added code to check for this at configure
time. We can't do a perfect job, since autoconf doesn't really know
about shell flow-control, but we can detect the error when it occurs
and report it to the user.
Tom
Re: make dist fixes, Brian Jones, 2002/02/07
- Re: make dist fixes,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: make dist fixes, Brian Jones, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Eric Blake, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Eric Blake, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Tom Tromey, 2002/02/08