[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug #976] Missing GPL exception and missing Copyright statements

From: Etienne M. Gagnon
Subject: Re: [Bug #976] Missing GPL exception and missing Copyright statements
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:12:00 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:02:03PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Please add the full copyright notice to the files that are missing them
> at the moment (and everybody, you should always make sure that the
> copyright notices are correct for files you check in). But check the nio
> files since some are automatically generated by the lib/
> script so you should add the full copyright to the master files in that
> case.

Hmm... It isn't obvious thar any of the files I listed are generated.
So, I will add the full copyright statement to them.

It would be interesting to possibly add copyright notices to the
*.properties files. 

I do not know how to modify the master scripts for the generated files
I identified in the bug report,
e.g. src/gnu/java/locale/LocaleInformation_*.java and
src/gnu/java/rmi/dgc/*_Skel/  Does somebody else knows
about those scripts (and would volunteer to help)?  Thanks.

> The javadoc files should probably be moved to the gjdoc project since
> they are not really part of the standard library anyway which means that
> they are not "normal" GNU Classpath sources (which impacts the license
> status). Brian is it OK if I add them to the gjdoc CVS tree and remove
> them from Classpath (I have write access to both)?

It would effectively be a good idea that everything in the classpath
CVS be licensed under GPL+excp, as advertized on the web page.



Etienne M. Gagnon          

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]