[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS
|
From: |
Michael Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:51:21 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:39 schrieb Casey Marshall:
> Ok, so if I understand this thread, the question is whether or not
> to drop a fairly clumsy, ugly, and hard-to-debug OS-dependent layer
> from Classpath that is really only used by a non-free virtual
> machine.
>
> Why is this a difficult decision? What exactly does your
> proprietary VM do for us?
Thats not true. Its currently used by jamvm, kissme and I think
sablevm, probably more.
Michael
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Roman Kennke, 2004/08/03
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Steven Augart, 2004/08/06
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/08/06
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andy Walter, 2004/08/06
- Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS (was: Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?), Steven Augart, 2004/08/06
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Casey Marshall, 2004/08/10
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS,
Michael Koch <=
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Casey Marshall, 2004/08/11
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Michael Koch, 2004/08/11
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Steven Augart, 2004/08/07
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Grzegorz B. Prokopski, 2004/08/08