[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Security manager problem
From: |
Anthony Green |
Subject: |
Re: Security manager problem |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:43:26 -0800 |
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 17:16 +0000, Gary Benson wrote:
> That's interesting, as I was just looking at an some code in an
> AccessController.doPrivileged() that was doing security checks.
> Perhaps JamVM's AccessController.doPrivileged() is not in fact doing
> anything.
Perhaps. Implementing proper sandbox behaviour is easy to defer. I
think it will take the kind of work you are doing to drive VMs to take
care of details like this. Do we even do it properly in libgcj (being
careful to account for reflection, etc)? I would be surprised.
AG
- Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Anthony Green, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Robert Lougher, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/07
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/12
- Re: Security manager problem, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/13
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/22
Re: Security manager problem, Tom Tromey, 2005/12/06