[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)

From: Mark Wielaard
Subject: Re: Fosdem discussions (Was: Importing GNU Classpath 0.20)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:53:01 +0100

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:20 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
> Mark>   Quick round where everybody tells what their personal, group,
> Mark>   organization/company work items are for the immediate and long
> Mark>   term future/next year.
> "Someone" (we haven't discussed who yet :-) from Red Hat will talk
> about what we're doing in general.  It seems pretty important to get
> this information out... it would be helpful if someone could take
> notes this year and post them.

That would be really nice. Especially if there was a little overview of
the things that regular classpath-patches hackers probably don't know
about like the jdwp work in gcj and the frysk system-monitoring and
debugging work which even regular GNU Classpath hackers probably know
little about since most development happens on other mailinglists.

Lets make sure we have note-takers available!

> Mark> Where can we as "upstream" help making deployment easier?
> Not to short-circuit the discussion or anything, but our current focus
> for this is improving testing.  The builder is helping here, but for
> Fedora I think we need to go a bit beyond that and test building the
> RPMs, running the resulting packages, etc.

Yes, that would be great. One thing I would really like to see is
auto-build, packaged native eclipse and jonas with running test-suites
like Andrew O. and Andrew H. have posted in the past.



Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!

Join the community at

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]