[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:05:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 |
On 02/08/2012 08:14 AM, Jérémy Compostella wrote:
>> That leads onto the only other possible implementation I suppose.
>> I.E. since we don't need to specify skip and skip_bytes together,
>> the option value could select between each mode. I.E.
>>
>> skip=2 => skip 2 blocks,
>> skip=2b => skip 1024 blocks,
>> skip=2bytes => skip 2 bytes
>>
>> Hmm, that's not too bad at all really
> I do agree, it looks like a very interesting idea indeed. However, I
> have two questions:
> 1. Why skip=2b => 1024 blocks ?
Because POSIX requires that one.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/dd.html
For the bs=, cbs=, ibs=, and obs= operands, the application shall supply
an expression specifying a size in bytes. The expression, expr, can be:
A positive decimal number
A positive decimal number followed by k, specifying multiplication
by 1024
A positive decimal number followed by b, specifying multiplication
by 512
Two or more positive decimal numbers (with or without k or b)
separated by x, specifying the product of the indicated values
> 2. Do you know if there is a utility function somewhere in coreutils or
> gnulib which could help me to parse this ? If such a function exists it
> could be able to manage more units (bytes, kbytes, megabytes, ...). If
> have to write such a function we have to discuss the possibilities I have to
> provide.
See how parse_integer() is already using xstrtoumax; it would just be a
matter of special-casing 'bytes', differently than 'b', and more like
'x' is special-cased.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/05
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/06
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/06
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/06
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/07
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/07
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/08
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/08
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Erik Auerswald, 2012/02/08
- RE: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/02/09
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/08
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/08
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Jérémy Compostella, 2012/02/10
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/10
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/11
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/13
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/02/13
- Re: dd: add 'skip_bytes' and 'count_bytes' operands, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/13