Re: [PATCH] tests: add extra protection against unexpected exits

[Bernhard Voelker]

On 01/14/2015 01:08 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 14/01/15 09:24, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> > On 01/14/2015 02:51 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > > -split -99999999999999999991 2> out && fail=1
> > > +split -99999999999999999991 2> out
> >
> > although the content of out is checked here, it wouldn't hurt
> > to assert $? = 1.
>
> Same point about about checking stderr independently.

Correct, but additionally to the stderr message split(1)
is mandated to exit(1) ... which we don't check anymore.
Same for the other test.

Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny