[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:38:35 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 19:44 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 08:40 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:33:46 +0100
> > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > What do we need for a release?
> >
> > Nothing here. We can freeze now and release this weekend if you want.
> > Just to be clear though.... Scripts can be pushed after freeze correct?
Did I answer the right question here? If you were meaning: can people
get the latest scripts after the release, then yes, as long as they
aren't dependent on new built-ins. But I think you know all about
that...
Richard
> Well, you could create an unusable package by a bad denemo.scm; but we
> can take a staged approach while looking for bugs: allow updates to doc
> and actions/menus for a few days while any showstoppers are fixed. I'll
> try to leave things tidy by the end of this evening. Then all being well
> we could create the tarball etc at the weekend.
> >
> > Did you want to send me your gpg public key so I can add you to the ftp
> > upload list?
> I am not sure I have one, I have lost track of that stuff. I hope Nils
> will be able to generate the Windows release via Gub.
>
> Richard
>
>
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> >
> >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel