[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:58:16 +0000 |
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 17:41 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> As you can read on the logs, the build are tested against gcc and
> clang.
these are the names of compilers - but I guess you mean that the target
O/S is GNU/Linux.
> I could not get the mingw compilation to work for the moment.
>
>
> I can try to help you there, do you have a reproducible scenario of
> you bug ?
yes - the
<row type="scheme">
<action>DeleteSelectionLeaveEmpty</action>
<menupath>/MainMenu/EditMenu/Select</menupath>
<_label>Delete Selected Objects</_label>
<_tooltip>Delete all selected objects and leave empty measures
behind</_tooltip>
</row>
entry in Default.commands does not cause the command
DeleteSelectionLeaveEmpty to load. Bizarrely I had a version of this
file where it was labelled <builtin>, but this version had not leaked
onto the git repository. It will have been created by a Save Command Set
command.
I have tried as a new user to save a new command and it reports errors
g_warning("Unable to find metadata file for script %s", name); but I
have yet to look deeply into that.
Richard
>
>
>
> 2013/10/28 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> It certainly looks good, but I haven't yet understood what
> exactly is
> being built with success... surely not a windows installer?
> I am hunting down some serious-looking trouble with the
> commands loading
> - some commands are simply not getting loaded, and saving new
> commands
> is not working properly. I expected this to be related to the
> alphabeticalizing of commands but it seems it is not. I'm
> afraid it is
> down to the re-factoring of the command load/storage into
> separate xml
> and scm parts, or some such.
> I am not sure which commands don't get loaded
> (Edit->Select->DeleteSelectionLeaveEmpty is one, which causes
> Edit->Delete to fail) and how important they are; so I don't
> know if the
> release should stand yet.
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 16:06 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> > I got back the denemo account on github. So here is a mirror
> of denemo
> > repository :
> > https://github.com/denemo/denemo
> >
> > It is updated every 5 minutes by my server. You can see the
> travis
> > status on this page :
> > https://travis-ci.org/denemo/denemo
> >
> >
> > So each time anyone commits on any branch, you can check a
> few minutes
> > later on Travis if the commit compiles.
> >
> > Great, isn't it ?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/28 Éloi Rivard <address@hidden>
> > Hey GTK3 for windows has been officially released !
> > http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/23 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > I thought so at one time, but the developers
> of code
> > such as GTK do not
> > anticipate people doing this, and so it
> never gets
> > tested.
> > We tried and got *very* close to a static
> build for
> > Denemo cross
> > compiling for windows using the mxe project.
> I was
> > actually able to run
> > Denemo under a (statically compiled) gdb on
> windows.
> > In fact, I am still
> > able to run our current Denemo builds under
> that
> > gdb.exe which I kept
> > around. That is the beauty of a statically
> built
> > executable, it carries
> > on working forever, more or less.
> > You will need to look back at the emails
> about this -
> > my memory doesn't
> > serve me well enough to give a blow-by-blow
> account of
> > what happened :(
> > they all refer to mxe I expect.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 10:17 +0200, Éloi
> Rivard wrote:
> > > Well, is gub mandatory ? Could it be
> possible to
> > statically compile
> > > every dependencies and just link them ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/10/23 Richard Shann
> <address@hidden>
> > > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 09:19 +0200,
> Éloi
> > Rivard wrote:
> > > > Travis run on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> Server
> > Edition 64 bit.
> > >
> > >
> > > I think this could require quite a
> bit of
> > delving into GUB to
> > > get the
> > > build working - I am not sure what
> the
> > LilyPond project uses,
> > > but
> > > Jeremiah has been using Debian's
> stable
> > distribution on 32-bit
> > > architecture (but possibly
> slightly old in
> > some way since I
> > > was able to
> > > build using the previous Debian
> Stable
> > distro on my 64 bit
> > > architecture
> > > and then found it would no longer
> work,
> > apparently because of
> > > an
> > > optimizer bug in gcc, failing to
> build
> > libxml2).
> > >
> > > I don't want to sound pessimistic
> (I often
> > do!) but GUB is
> > > very large,
> > > especially when it is building
> Denemo (with
> > LilyPond,
> > > Ghostscript, font
> > > generation, even LilyPond
> documentation
> > generation thrown
> > > in)...
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> > >
> > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se
> tromper. »
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> >
> > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> >
> > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, (continued)
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/22
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/22
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/10/31