[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio...
From: |
ed |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio... |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:00:54 -0500 |
At 09:11 AM 12/18/02 -0800, address@hidden wrote:
Fortunately, all the "restricted" can be harvest from obsolete consumer
gear, for example cable modems, at least for building receivers. They
would have to ban down converters and all RF kits. Nahhh.
** screed mode on *** at the risk of sounding alarmist, don't
underestimate what the FCC can enforce. after successfully banning the
u.s. sale of radio receivers that covered 800MHz analog cellular
frequencies to non-government users, they proceeded to ban the sale of
downconverters that allowed UHF receivers to receive 800MHz analog cellular
frequencies. at least one company (GRE) was forced to stop selling their
downconverter. then the FCC successfully forced another company
(Optoelectronics) to take their 800MHz bandpass filter off the
market. these were hobby electronics products, not mainstream consumer
electronics products.
a conversation with an Optoelectronics engineer about the bandpass filter
incident was eye-opening: he said the FCC basically told them all their
future products' FCC type-acceptance could be "delayed" unless they stopped
selling this bandpass filter to non-government customers. kits are
definately the best way to go for gnuradio hardware, but even that's no
guarantee of government non-interference:
about three years ago two-decade old kit maker Ramsey Electronics, Inc. was
raided by US Customs for selling a miniature low-power crystal-controlled
VHF transmitter kit for the 2-meter amateur band (which was popular with
ham radio operators, school electronics clubs, boy scout troops, etc.) the
mere fact that it was small enough to potentially be used for
"surreptitious audio interception" (a.k.a. bugging) resulted in about $30K
in inventory being confiscated from ramsey's warehouse at gunpoint. the
resulting legal charges cost john ramsey several hundred thousand
dollars--and they've still not been adjudicated.
http://www.2600.com/news/display/display.shtml?id=348
earlier that year, the late hobbyist publisher bill cheek was arrested at
his home in california for selling a simple 4-level data slicer kit based
around a 741 op-amp. although it had numerous legal hobby applications,
the fact that someone in new york ordered and used one to demodulate
unencrypted police mobile data terminal (MDT) FM transmissions--which was
itself arguably legal--resulted in cheek's arrest for violating federal
wiretapping charges for distributing hardware or software that could be
creatively categorized under Title III (U.S.C. 18, Section 2512.) gnuradio
hardware and software could be creatively described the same way.
the bottom line is there are enough federal laws and regulations--and
creative interpretations of them--to keep gnuradio underground if the
federal government really wants to. the actual use of gnuradio "hardware
or software" for controversial applications isn't the issue. *potential*
applications are what's covered by the letter of the law--and for that
reason it will probably become an issue eventually. however misguided,
some well-connected entities may eventually view gnuradio hardware and
software as a threat to their interests...and that could be all it takes to
create serious problems for the gnuradio project.
shipping partial gnuradio hardware kits without documentation to u.s.
customers from countries with less restrictive spectrum restrictions may be
one possible solution. encrypting distro files may be another. in any
case, it might be prudent to be aware of potential roadblocks the gnuradio
project might encounter when--not if--someone with "juice" becomes annoyed
or pissed at the mere existence of gnuradio hardware or software.
-ed ** screed mode off **
- [Discuss-gnuradio] New FCC inquiry re additional spectrum for unlicensed devices, Eric Blossom, 2002/12/16
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Tim Pozar, 2002/12/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., David Willmore, 2002/12/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Steve Schear, 2002/12/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Tim Pozar, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Steve Schear, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Tim Pozar, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Steve Schear, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio...,
ed <=
- Message not available
- [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", ed, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", Frank Brickle, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", ed, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", Frank Brickle, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", ed, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", Eric Blossom, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", Dave Emery, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] amateur "exemption", Steve Schear, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., Dave Emery, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Part 15 and Gnuradio..., ed, 2002/12/19