[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] pll refout vs carriertracking
From: |
Robert McGwier |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] pll refout vs carriertracking |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:44:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) |
Sorry. I missed what you referred to in the early email. I misread
it. I agree that refout and carriertracking should not be doing the
same thing. I will look at it.
Bob
Matt Ettus wrote:
Robert McGwier wrote:
I did that on purpose. There are myriad instances where you want the
recovered carrier or tone but not have the complex input mixed to the
"new zero". If you want a recovery and baseband, I suggest that
rather than do an if test, we make a new module that is track and mix.
Yes, but that is what refout is for. Right now refout and
carriertracking do the exact same thing.
Matt
--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be
made in a very narrow field." Niels Bohr