[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit
From: |
Daniel O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:57:32 +0930 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > It would probably be a fairly marginal difference though..
> > (Right? I haven't done any tests..)
>
> Twice as many registers available for the compiler in 64-bit mode.
> This makes a big difference, since the X86 architecture is register
> starved.
Yes, I am aware there are architectural improvements but theory doesn't
always hold :)
(ie I am wondering if anyone has done a comparison)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Manaen Schlabach, 2007/08/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Chris Stankevitz, 2007/08/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Eric Blossom, 2007/08/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Manaen Schlabach, 2007/08/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Daniel O'Connor, 2007/08/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Eric Blossom, 2007/08/06
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit,
Daniel O'Connor <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Chris Stankevitz, 2007/08/06
- [Discuss-gnuradio] makefiles trouble, Hans Glitsch, 2007/08/06
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] makefiles trouble, Eric Blossom, 2007/08/06
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] makefiles trouble, Hans Glitsch, 2007/08/06
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] makefiles trouble, Daniel O'Connor, 2007/08/06
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 64 bit vs 32 bit, Daniel O'Connor, 2007/08/06