RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value

[Ulrika Uppman]

Sorry I made a mistake, I used the wrong fpga-build and firmware when I ran the 
vrt branch. When I discovered my mistake I downloaded the files from 
http://www.ettus.com/usrp2_vrt but I cannot get the USRP2 to work with these 
files. The leds go on just as normal, but when I try to run ./find_usrps I just 
get "No USRP2 found". Does anyone know where to get the proper image files for 
the fpga and firmware?

Regards,
/Ulrika

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
>  On Behalf Of Ulrika Uppman
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:48 AM
> To: Per Zetterberg
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value
> 
> Hi,
> I have now tried both the git master and the vrt branch and 
> the results there are similar to those in the 3.2 version.
> 
> I was guessing that the timestamps would be generated/handled 
> differently in the vrt branch but at a first glance I didn't 
> see any major differences in the code. What is the difference 
> with regard to timestamps and timing when using the vrt branch?
> 
> Regards,
> /Ulrika
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Per Zetterberg [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:16 PM
> > To: Ulrika Uppman
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value
> > 
> > >>
> > >> Do anyone know why the difference in timestamp value
> > between received
> > >> packets is so big? What am I missing here?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> /Ulrika
> > 
> > Have you tried the vrt branch by jblum ?
> > 
> > BR/
> > Per
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>