discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argume


From: Josh Blum
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argument
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:53:08 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7

http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?h=next&id=649e4387848a5d9273983600be6f35c3e2a88191

Definitely tags related, that change broke it. -josh

On 02/10/2011 12:56 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Josh Blum <address@hidden> wrote:
>> ./shmget_demo_issue.py -v 1024 -n 2048
>> gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argument
>> gr_buffer::allocate_buffer: failed to allocate buffer of size 16392 KB
>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
>>  what():  std::bad_alloc
>> Aborted
>>
>>
>> So, I have the latest gnuradio next and ubuntu 10.10. This issue crops
>> up whenever I try to run the wxgui fftsink with my usrp2 at full rate,
>> and on several different computers.
>>
>> I have recreated the problem with a simple python app. No message
>> queues, no usrp hardware, no graphics, just core gnuradio blocks.
>> Application attached.
>>
>> null source -> keep one in n -> null sink
>>
>> Basically, increasing the N (decimation) to a high enough number causes
>> this issue consistently. Why should more decimation cause this? Did
>> something in the tags implementation change this behavior? Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Josh
> 
> 
> ACK. Thanks for the report and test case. I have no idea what's
> causing it right now, and I really can't see how the tags would have
> interfered.
> 
> What happens if you go back to the master or even the 3.3.0 release package?
> 
> Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]