discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Questions about the qt frequency display.


From: Stefan Gofferje
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Questions about the qt frequency display.
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:04:23 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Lightning/1.0b2 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/02/2011 01:45 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> This might fall into more of a religious/philosophical argument than a
> technical one. To me, seeing the negative frequency is very natural,
> even if it's just a mirror. I honestly don't know if I'm in the majority
> or minority on this one, or if it's a function of how I was taught and
> my professors' ways that have stuck with me. So the way the QT sink
> works "feels" more correct to me.

Maybe it's mathematician/scientist vs. tech guy point of view :). Or HF
vs. NF guy...
I know both views from hardware spectrum displays from the different
worlds. The HF displays I know show baseband +/- $BANDWIDTH/2 and the NF
displays 0 - $BANDWIDTH. I would suppose, the average audio tech guy
would be as confused by the baseband +/- $BANDWIDTH/2 display as I was
:). I am aware that the focus of the GNURadio project is on the HF side
but maybe taking the NF guys into consideration wouldn't harm :).
Talking practically, the mirrored display is less an issue than "losing"
half of the bandwidth in the display, which might contain interesting data.

- -- 
 (o_   Stefan Gofferje            | SCLT, MCP, CCSA
 //\   Reg'd Linux User #247167   | VCP #2263
 V_/_  Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2+j7cACgkQbQKZlCdPOMNIKACeJTwYu/rHwnHHfckUUqBfLfnu
O+MAnijQdTbBCsBoZzmrP07UGWQjbi+x
=5IPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]