[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: Programmatic EOAssociations problems
From: |
Yann Le Guen |
Subject: |
FW: Programmatic EOAssociations problems |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2001 22:45:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2106 |
----------
> De : "Eric Hermanson" <eric@alum.mit.edu>
> Date : Thu, 17 May 2001 13:35:39 -0700
> À : "Scott Anguish" <sanguish@digifix.com>, "Brian Hill"
> <brian_hill@unioncab.com>
> Cc : "MacOSX-dev" <macosx-dev@omnigroup.com>, <webobjects-dev@omnigroup.com>
> Objet : Re: Programmatic EOAssociations problems
>
>> I'm getting the strong impression that Apple just doesn't even want to
>> hear about EOF on OSX bugs, since I'm being told that EOF/Cocoa isn't
>> actually supported anymore.
>
> I don't know how Apple would support EOF in Cocoa (other than a hacked bridge)
> given the two different languages? Does the lack of EOF support in Cocoa come
> as a surprise to anyone? I think that fact was inherent in the details when
> Apple decided to port EOF to Java.
>
> Aside from someone figuring out how to write a compiler that will turn Obj-C
> source into Java bytecode, I think another option is for Apple to release the
> Objective-C version of FoundationKit and EOF 3 into Darwin opensource, to
> allow
> the community to keep it up-to-date with EOF/Java.
>
> Hmm, and what's up with GNUStep?
>
> - Eric
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WebObjects-dev mailing list
> WebObjects-dev@omnigroup.com
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- FW: Programmatic EOAssociations problems,
Yann Le Guen <=