[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
From: |
Bissell, Tim |
Subject: |
RE: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:01:26 -0000 |
My list of favoured extensions would be:
* class variable
* sequences - e.g. [textField setBackgroundColor:NSLightGray;
setStringValue:@"foo"];
is equivalent to: [textField setBackgroundColor:NSLightGray];
[textField setStringValue:@"foo"];
With the current idiom being to make methods return void rather than
self, this
construct would not penalise people who write lots of short zero or one
parameter
methods, rather than a few massive, multiparameter methods.
* try/catch/finally exception handling
* Blocks!
regards,
Tim
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), (continued)
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Pascal Bourguignon, 2001/11/19
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Dan Pascu, 2001/11/20
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Balazs Pataki, 2001/11/20
- Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Stan Shebs, 2001/11/19
- Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Ovidiu Predescu, 2001/11/19
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, dewar, 2001/11/19
RE: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++,
Bissell, Tim <=
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Stan Shebs, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Wim Oudshoorn, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Helge Hess, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Wim Oudshoorn, 2001/11/20