[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Next Version of preflight.sh out <VirusChecked>
From: |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
Subject: |
Next Version of preflight.sh out <VirusChecked> |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:40:59 +0200 |
After days of lingering around I finaly put together a new version of
preflight.sh.
What's new?
- you can save the output to a file now
- you can save debug information to a file now (well, that's a feature
that only I need ;-))
- preflight.sh now prints information regarding the importance of the
various bits and pieces (that rating is not final now)
- some formating of the output
please test it and send your preflight.out and preflight.debug to me if
you discover something strange.
to Jay McCarthy:
> On OpenBSD 3.0-stable, it dies on line 2993: "syntax error near
> unexpected token 'else'"
should be fixed now. I asume you used the very first version of
preflight.sh (were there was an error indeed)
to Tristan Alexander McLeay:
> Result: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE; it appears to work fine except that it
doesn't
> find ffcall stuff even though it's installed.
Don't know what is going wrong here. checked the differences between
GNUstep-base's configure script and preflight.sh but found nothing
relevant. What result gives the configure script of GNUstep-base to you?
to Dennis Leeuw:
> Still have the following problem:
> checking for ffi.h... no
> checking for forwarding callback in runtime... no
> checking for callback.h... yes
> checking FFI library usage... none
> preflight.sh: warning: No ffcall interface library found
>
> ! GNUstep requires the ffcall library to do invocations and DO
> ! Make sure this library is installed (see installation
instructions)
> ! Otherwise DO will not be compatible with other systems
Again, I don't know the cause for this. Could you also please send me your
preflight.out, preflight.debug and possibly the output of GNUstep-base's
configure to me?
to David Ayers:
> preflight.sh
> The script tests for ObjC-threads before testing for ObjC. So if
ObjC
> doesn't work it reports that threads don't work. May be the check for
ObjC could
> be placed infront of ObjC threads. (I was mislead by believing the lack
of
> threading had to do with the objc problems)
I took the code for this check from configure of GNUstep-base. The code
for testing "wether objc really works" depends a little on the check for
threading. One more time, I have no clue what is causing this. Does the
configure script recognize threading properly? Please send me all your
output too.
Now I won't miss the opportunity to thank everybody who helped me in this
case: Many thanks to all!
greetings, Lars
preflight.sh
Description: Binary data
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Next Version of preflight.sh out <VirusChecked>,
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <=