[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Odd build behavior?
From: |
e.sammer |
Subject: |
Odd build behavior? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2002 07:01:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020523 |
All:
I am getting NSRangeExceptions when making a call to [NSUnarchiver
unarchiveObjectWithData:] as it tries to read the typestream. With some
help from some folks on #gnustep, we tried to track it down to no avail.
Here's what's strange... What _does_ fix the problem is compiling with
debug=yes. Any other build "styles" (i.e. debug=no, warn=blah, etc.)
yeild a nonfunctional binary with the above problem. Of course, I can't
say for sure if this is a GS thing (I don't think it is) but if anyone
else sees this behavior in GS, please let me know as I do need to build
non-debugging versions of my work at some point.
One of the things that may be a contributing factor (this is shotgun
debugging) is that I compiled gcc 3.1 but did not update glibc anytime
recently which just feels wrong. Either way, it's really really odd and
if anyone has an idea about what it could be... etc, etc...
Thanks in advance.
--
e.sammer <eric@linuxstep.org>
http://www.linuxstep.org
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)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=/vyA
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
- Odd build behavior?,
e.sammer <=