[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:38:50 +0100 |
Philip Mötteli wrote:
>
> In my eyes it's not a good thing to add that officially to the base
> library. We wouldn't be compatibel to the original. There's no
> behaviour in OpenStep, nor in the Foundations of Mac OS X.
For practical reasons, this isn't possible (-base uses behaviors
internally). I agree that it should probably be kept out of the standard
headers, though. And since it is runtime dependent and not directly
connected to GNUstep, libobjc seems like the best place to put it (if
whoever is responsible for libobjc will accept it).
- Alexander Malmberg
- "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/11/15
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Alexander Malmberg, 2002/11/15
- Re[2]: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/11/15
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, David Ayers, 2002/11/18
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/11/18
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Alexander Malmberg, 2002/11/18
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, David Ayers, 2002/11/18
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Philip Mötteli, 2002/11/18
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Nicola Pero, 2002/11/25
- Re[2]: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/11/18
- Re: Re[2]: "multiple inheritence" / behavior, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/11/18