[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep's release readiness
From: |
Stefan Urbanek |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep's release readiness |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:38:07 +0100 |
On 2002-12-26 16:21:32 +0100 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:
On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 07:49 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
All,
By and large 2002 has been a good year for GNUstep. It seems to me that we
are ready for a major release of all of the available applications.
As such we have a couple of questions which should be considered:
1) Which applications should be considered?
2) What major issues should be addressed before the release?
I think of Gorm and ProjectCenter as part of the developer bundle (along with
the core libraries).
At the least, GNUMail, Gworkspace, and Preferences could be in a user bundle.
I would recommend also to include the Affiche app - mainly because as a service
provider example (Make Note). Services are grat thing in gnustep, i have not
seen something similar in other environments. Services are one of those little
things that makes the life with computer easier.
Terminal.app is also usable.
Moreover, I think, that we have to agree on more consistent application names.
I would suggest not to use any prefix (G, GS, GNU) and name it just like
Preferences.app, Workplace.app (not to conflict with Workpsace.app) or
PostMan.app (not to conflict with Apple/NeXT Mail.app)...
In a text application should be referenced simply either by 'Preferences.app'
or 'Preferences application'.
The problem is how do you release them as a bundle? Do you provide one
top-level make file? How about an installer application (now I've opened a can
of worms...).
I think that for apps we do not need installer application, just .tar.gz of
.app bundled binaries. I am not sure about the other kinds of
packages...(frameworks, libraries,...)
Stefan