discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: GNUstep.org


From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: Re[4]: GNUstep.org
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:34:15 -0700


On Thursday, January 8, 2004, at 05:30 AM, MJ Ray wrote:

On 2004-01-08 00:34:21 +0000 Manuel Guesdon <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:46:50 +0100 Stefan Urbanek <address@hidden> wrote:
| SPIP is really nice and easy to use. If GNUstep were using spip, it would be much easier to maintain site contents

Would we lose nearly all our mirrors? We have the gnustep.org ones and the gnu.org ones. That's why I'm jumping through hoops to retemplate it and part of why it takes a while.

IMO, the problem is that we need more help. A glossy CMS with insufficient help will still be bad, just as the current web site with insufficient help has been bad.


I agree completely. There are many sites that gnustep is mirrored on and many of them don't even have PHP, much less anything more useful.

Also, while MJ and Scott and others have done a great job with the site design, there are huge portions of the content that haven't been updated in years and no one has even suggested updating them, much less done any work to do it.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]