Re: test driven development for GNUstep

[Adam Fedor]

On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 06:17 PM, Alexander Malmberg wrote:

> I think I prefer a standalone core/tests/. While the framework is nice
> and small now, a "testing backend" and support for generating event
> sequences and doing matching on the rendering output will take a fair
> bit of code, and that wouldn't belong in -make. Also, I already have
> testing code that's needed for both -base and -gui (NSCoding tests, 
> some
> class cluster tests that have concrete implementations in both -base 
> and
> -gui), and that doesn't belong in -make, either.

Just a check - is it going to get s complicated that we will wish we 
had used a preexisting test framework? Or are the things we want to do 
unique enough that it's worth it?

Also, is it possible to separate the test framework from the tests so 
it can be used by other projects (gdl2, Gorm, etc)?