[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: |
11 Oct 2005 08:25:33 GMT |
Andrew Ruder <aeruder@ksu.edu> wrote:
> I am proposing that GNUstep migrate to using subversion [...]
This seems worth not doing yet because:
1. Subversion shares CVS's client-server design flaw, hindering
disconnected, distributed and fault-tolerant operation;
2. git-based tools seem to be winning the version control war;
3. Subversion is under a GPL-incompatible licence.
I appreciate anyone wanting to move away from CVS, but SVN seems
to be trading one set of problems for another.
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration,
MJ Ray <=
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Helge Hess, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Helge Hess, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Alex Perez, 2005/10/11
- Message not available
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, MJ Ray, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Jeremy Tregunna, 2005/10/12