[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some GNUstep observations
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Some GNUstep observations |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:54:34 -0800 (PST) |
Andreas,
--- Andreas Höschler <ahoesch@smartsoft.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having built GNUstep (latest cvs) on Solaris 10 and running apps under
> the Sun Java Desktop (replacement for GNOME) I encounter the following
> behaviour.
>
> After closing a modal dialog (e.g. a login panel), clicking on a menu
> entry causes the menu to be put into the background (very annoying). I
> have to doubleclick on the app icon to get it back to front. I haven't
> seen this behaviour with an older version of GNUstep on Solaris 9 under
> Window Manager (a bunch of differences that might lead to this error).
> But I would guess that a recent change to one of the GNUstep frameworks
> causes this behaviour. Does this ring any bells? Can anybody can
> confirm my observation?
I haven't seen this. I will have to get my old Solaris machine out to test it.
> Under Window Manager the setDocumentEditied: status is visually
> presented by the broken cross. This does not work under KDE, GNOME,
> SJD,... Is it anyhow possible to get this feature into these other
> (default) UIs? GNUstep apps are basically useless without this feature
> IMHO, so Window Manager seems to be a must. However, users might
> already got used to GNOME, SJD,... or would like to stay with these
> enviroments for other reasons (looks fancier). Any chance?
GNUstep is useless without the broken cross!? That's a bit of an extreme
position don't you think? I never knew it was such a mission-critical, do or
die feature! Regardless of this, whether or not it works is entirely window
manager specific. I'm not sure if KDE or GNOME actually have this feature as
I've never checked.
> Thanks a lot!
No problem.
> Regards,
>
> Andreas
Later, GJC
Gregory John Casamento
-- Principal Consultant, Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.)
## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep.
Re: Some GNUstep observations, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/11/14