[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers]
From: |
phil taylor |
Subject: |
Re: Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers] |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:35:58 +1000 |
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 03:38 +0100, Nicolas Roard wrote:
> > > So, it seems the situation is like this:
> > > * Faction A loves GNUstep for its NeXT goodness
> > > * Faction B thinks GNUstep is out of place and should play nice
> > > with other
> > > desktops.
> > > * Probably some people believe both are true.
> >
Its all very subjective i guess.
Take the case of the side by side lists used to browse the directory
structure within GNUstep. Its the most functional and easiest method I
have ever come across for directory browsing. Far superior IMO to the
standard Windows collapsible tree. But also simply gawky and
unattractive to look at.
In fact I developed independantly an identical set up in a Visual Basic
program I wrote ten years or so ago (without ever seeing GNUstep or
Nextstep or any other kind of step) and got it working fine, but decided
against using it in the end as it looked so bad (IMO).
Do Apple still use this setup for directory browsing?
- Fwd: really attracting developers, (continued)
- scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Marc Brünink, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Pete French, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Sašo Kiselkov, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Marc Brünink, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Charles Philip Chan, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Andrew Sveikauskas, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Charles Philip Chan, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Andrew Sveikauskas, 2006/09/04
- Re: Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Nicolas Roard, 2006/09/04
- Re: Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers],
phil taylor <=
- Re: Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Charles Philip Chan, 2006/09/05
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], phil taylor, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Charles Philip Chan, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], phil taylor, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Chris Vetter, 2006/09/05
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], phil taylor, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Yen-Ju Chen, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], Helge Hess, 2006/09/04
- Re: scrollbars [was: Re: really attracting developers], phil taylor, 2006/09/04