[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fucked up gnustep-make
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
RE: Fucked up gnustep-make |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:47:21 +0100 (CET) |
>Hi,
>
> gs_cv_make_version=`make --version | head -1 | sed -e 's/^[^0-9]*//'`
>
> :0> make --version
> make: illegal option -- -
>
> NOT everyone is using LinSux.
Thanks, you found a bug!
I applied Adam's patch to trunk, can you check it if works for you now ? :-)
> And yes, I know SVN isn't supposed to be stable.
> But that doesn't mean a developer shouldn't use some care when
> uploading new code.
>
> Stunts like that doesn't help GNUstep.
If you need stable code, please use gnustep-make 1.13.0. You can
find it in the Download section on the GNUstep web page.
If you are using trunk, it is because you *want* to test unstable code.
Which is very useful, especially since you are using a different Unix
than I am using, so you're liked to spot bugs that slipped through.
So I do encourage you to do it! But keep in mind you're testing unstable
code.
Thanks
PS: If you need relatively stable code, please don't use trunk for a week or
two,
as I'll keep committing changes for a while now. But the only way to complete
the Linux FHS support is working on it.
- Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, (continued)
Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, Adam Fedor, 2007/02/13
Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2007/02/13
RE: Fucked up gnustep-make,
Nicola Pero <=
Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/13
Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/13
Re: Fucked up gnustep-make, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/14