[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linking setup with gnustep-make 2.0.1 on Solaris
|
From: |
Fabian Groffen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Linking setup with gnustep-make 2.0.1 on Solaris |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:45:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (Linux 2.6.20-1.2925.fc6, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1) |
On 12-06-2007 15:38:01 +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> My question now is what the correct usage of gnustep-make is: GNUstep.sh or
> GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES? In the latter case, I'd like to add an additional -R for
> every -L, but I'd need some pointers for where to make this change.
We [1] use some experimental -rpath (-R) support for Linux (and Solaris),
which seems to work fine so far, thereby eliminating the dreaded
LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable. A problem here unfortunately is on Darwin.
The library install_names are set to the library only, not their full
path. I haven't had time to look into this yet, but I really would like
to get GNUstep linking using run path/install names.
I'm not sure why the GNUstep developers chose for this approach. I'd
like to know if the GNUstep developers have an interest for changing
this or not.
[1] Gentoo GNUstep overlay - http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/gnustep
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level