Re: Packaging Windows apps so as not to require separate GNUstep install

[Riccardo Mottola]

Eric Wasylishen wrote:
> Great to hear, I didn't know it was already possible. It would be cool
> to have GNUstep-make presets for some of these configurations then.
> When I get around to finishing my app port, I'll have a look at that.
>
> FWIW this (supposed) problem seemed to be GNUstep's main deterrent for
> this blogger:  
> http://cocoawithlove.com/2010/04/options-for-porting-objective-ccocoa.html
>    

I think that blog entry is a bit misleading. I replied.

Although it is possible, it is abit cumbersome. A script for changing 
the drive letter could be useful. Or a guide on how to package the bare 
minimum inside an application...

Of course, a pretty good solution would be to install the gnustep "core 
runtime" on dependency of an application, so it gets shared. THis is 
what .NET does for example.
After all, the comparison .NET and GNUstep+objc is not even that far 
stretched.

Riccardo