[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FOSDEM roundup
From: |
Ivan Vučica |
Subject: |
Re: FOSDEM roundup |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:10:37 +0100 |
On 9. vel. 2011., at 13:23, David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> So I guess some tutorial like sessions would come handy next time. I can
>> imagine sessions like: "Creating cross plattform applications with GNUstep –
>> a primer", "Using Gorm to create a cross plattform GUI", "Objective-C tips
>> and tricks", "Objective-C for C++ programmers – the differences, the
>> similarities" or "Useful frameworks helping you to create your application –
>> an overview" or the like. Maybe that would be not to interesting for
>> seasoned GNUstep developers but we're doing the whole event not just for us.
>
> I think that's a good idea. We should probably regard the devroom as more of
> an advertising opportunity than as a place for communication between
> developers.
All of this, plus let's not forget that GNUstep could benefit from online
illustrated and/or video tutorials on creating simple apps, and an improved
documentation browser. (GnomeTheme already makes apps look lovely and
relatively integrated!)
Getting a simple NSDocument-based app to work would be an awesome exercise and
tutorial. If the tutorial also contained an overview of hyper-useful stuff such
as outline views, table views, et cetera -- well, that would already mean a
lot. Explaining nib concepts such as File's Owner, class definitions in nibs,
et cetera from the point of view of Gorm and GNUstep might mean a lot in
GNUstep's popularization not only among FLOSS developers, but among others.
Both FOSDEM workshops and online tutorials are important -- and the tutorials
themselves could be a good reference.
I remember that getting started with Zcode was exercise in forcing oneself to
read tons of long documentation and understanding how GNUstep's concepts differ
from Apple's. (I've mostly had issue connecting outlets in Gorm, and
understanding that I actually had to update classes in Gorm as well.)
> We reserved a timeslot for us to discuss how to go about adding UIKit
> support to GNUstep, but only about a quarter of the people in the room at the
> time were GNUstep developers, so we couldn't do much meaningful discussion.
Getting UIKit into GNUstep would be awesome; if not the entirety of it, at
least wrappers that use equivalent AppKit classes. Something like what UMeKit
is doing, but more complete (covering buttons et al as well).
--
Regards,
Ivan Vučica
ivan@vucica.net - http://ivan.vucica.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature