Re: Doxygen documentation

[David Chisnall]

Unfortunately, the output from doxygen is pretty horrible for Objective-C.

You might like to take a look at the DocGenerator that Quentin wrote, in Étoilé 
svn.  It uses simpler markup and produces much nicer output.

David

On 20 Sep 2011, at 01:23, Stefan Bidi wrote:

> I just wanted to let everyone know that I've started documenting corebase 
> with doxygen instead of autogsdoc.  The learning curve is quite steep if 
> you're just starting out, but I'm getting the hang of it.  The configuration 
> file has at least a few hundred options... I managed to understand only 5 of 
> them.  The output is decent, but needs a lot more work to be be useful.
> 
> I know there was some talk about it a few weeks ago.  I just took a better 
> look at it and I found doxygen much more powerful than autogsdoc.  I had to 
> download 100+ MB worth of packages to get it to even do anything on my 
> system, however.  Corebase is still a very small project so I figured it was 
> a good test bed for this sort of thing.  Let me know what you guys think (run 
> "doxygen Doxyfile" to have it output the html).
> 
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep


-- Sent from my Difference Engine