[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits |
Date: |
Sun, 27 May 2012 18:48:19 +0100 |
On 27 May 2012, at 18:31, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> That was a very nice explanation, but in this specific case, I don't see how
> floating point pointers come into play. Did you look at the actual code in
> question? This is just an integer swapping macro that operates on the fields
> in a time zone structure.
Ooops, I misread the code - I thought it was byte-swapping floats using a
function that expected ints. In this case, I think it's a spurious error, and
doesn't appear with clang 3.1, so presumably a fixed spurious error...
David
-- Sent from my brain
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, (continued)
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Benoît Garrigues, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Stefan Bidi, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Benoît Garrigues, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Stefan Bidi, 2012/05/27