[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits
From: |
Stefan Bidi |
Subject: |
Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits |
Date: |
Sun, 27 May 2012 13:06:39 -0500 |
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org> wrote:
> On 27 May 2012, at 18:31, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
>> That was a very nice explanation, but in this specific case, I don't see how
>> floating point pointers come into play. Did you look at the actual code in
>> question? This is just an integer swapping macro that operates on the fields
>> in a time zone structure.
>
> Ooops, I misread the code - I thought it was byte-swapping floats using a
> function that expected ints. In this case, I think it's a spurious error,
> and doesn't appear with clang 3.1, so presumably a fixed spurious error...
>
> David
It's easy enough to workaround the warning. GCC doesn't complain when
you pass debug=yes to make, either.
I'm in the process of fixing the errors found in the static analyzer
now. I was going to ask how to run that myself, but I see you already
mentioned that on another e-mail.
Thanks
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, (continued)
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Stefan Bidi, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Benoît Garrigues, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, Fred Kiefer, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits, David Chisnall, 2012/05/27
- Re: Test on Ubuntu 12.04 64bits,
Stefan Bidi <=