|
From: | Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: | Re: Retreive installed gnustep version |
Date: | Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:47:16 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 |
Hi, David Chisnall wrote:
I don't know if "make" supports debian-style "splitting". Here we are speaking of a greater change than just setting the "layout" and the "prefix" settings.This shouldn't be true, if they install -make from the packages too. In the FreeBSD case, if you install the core GNUstep packages from, uh, packages, then you will be able to compile things with the same compile flags and so on that we do - the other packages are all built using the gnustep-make package.
I think it makes sense. Although GNUstep would say "System" are system-related applications and "Local" local to the machine, I think it is a choice that would amke things more manageable for the user who wants to mix apps, grossly remapping "/usr" and Local to "/usr/local"As a somewhat related question, I am pondering whether it makes sense for FreeBSD to switch to installing all packaged applications in the System domain, so that Local is free for installed-from-source things, and it becomes trivial to revert to the system-provided stuff by just blowing away the Local domain.
I wonder what the opinion of others on this topic is, Gregory, Richard, Nicola....
Riccardo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |