[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab
From: |
Svetlana A. Tkachenko |
Subject: |
Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:20:19 +1100 |
> Gitlab is OPEN SOURCE. :) It is not proprietary.
1) It does not label its frontend's JavaScript with the licenses (C0.0).
2) Gitlab links to about.gitlab.com which sells a proprietary product.
The free GitLab version is bait-and-switch for their so-called
enterprise version which is proprietary software.
3) GitLab does not encourage submissions which are freely licensed (C5).
I might suggest things from this list:
- http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah/
- repo.or.cz, can create new repo without review, but no issue tracker
- Redmine has issue tracker and source code hosting and wiki (but not
multilingual afaik, maybe with a plugin)
- ... (you pick)
--
Svetlana A. Tkachenko
Member of the Free Software Foundation
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org www.freenode.net
- Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, ChanMaxthon, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab,
Svetlana A. Tkachenko <=
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Riccardo Mottola, 2015/12/04
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Matt Rice, 2015/12/04
- Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, ChanMaxthon, 2015/12/04
Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab, Alessandro Sangiuliano, 2015/12/04