[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews
From: |
Xavier Brochard |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:13:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) |
Le 31 juillet, 11:04:44 Ivan Vučica a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:41 AM Xavier Brochard <xavier@alternatif.org>
>
> wrote:
> > One problem is that the GNUstep project has nearly nothing to show to end
> > users (except screenshots and descriptions). As a consequence a lot of
> > people
> > doesn't understand the project. They want to do a quick try but they
> > can't.
> > (in France we have the great http://linuxfr.org website where such
> > questions
> > often comes.)
>
> We discussed whether we want to have "GNUstep OS" or "GNUstep Desktop" at
> the 2015 meetup, and the conclusion was IIRC "no". We vaguely agreed that
> "reference system" would be fine.
I've forgotten that!
> It's slightly unfortunate we don't have one yet, but Live CDs like this are
> a good thing to address this problem. I need to try it out... :)
>
> Maybe you wonder why the talk about a "reference system" instead of a
> proper "desktop environment"? I think what we generally agreed upon is that
> GNUstep itself is not quite a desktop, but a set of development libraries
> for writing applications. Think Gtk, not Gnome. We need something to show
> off, but as we don't quite want to discourage particular use cases (Sparc
> systems running Solaris with an old GCC, drawing directly with xlib. Or x32
> Windows systems drawing with Cairo built with cygwin) it becomes hard to
> say "this is the true GNUstep environment, you should use this".
>
> But that we should have a reference system that we can point people to? Yes.
Thanks for the clarification. Building the true GNUstep environment would
never be my purpose : I want to write recipes that can help to install a light
and working desktop for peoples that need it. Something that can also help to
later install a full developper environment or a testing environmemnt, etc. Or
something that can attract people to write or improve small apps as a starting
point to development.
> So in light of above comments, here's answers based on what I would
> consider a 'reference' system:
Thanks!
> (...)
> > - can I take some Etoilé components ?
>
> I don't know what this question means? Of course, yes, you can take some
> Etoile components. :)
These were real questions some people asked for :-) It shoulb be translated
as "which Etoilé components are usable and useful, how to install, etc."
> One of the things you omitted is "which gnustep-gui backend should I use?".
> The answer is almost certainly "cairo". "opal" backend was not ready last
> time I used/wrote it :) while "cairo" is fully functioning.
This is a typical point not easy to understand while browsing GNUstep website.
Thanks again!
Xavier
- GNUstep Live on OSnews, Liam Proven, 2017/07/28
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Ivan Vučica, 2017/07/29
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Thom Cherryhomes, 2017/07/29
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Riccardo Mottola, 2017/07/30
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, David Chisnall, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Xavier Brochard, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, David Chisnall, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Liam Proven, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, David Chisnall, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Riccardo Mottola, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Liam Proven, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Xavier Brochard, 2017/07/31
- Re: GNUstep Live on OSnews, Riccardo Mottola, 2017/07/31