> Am 06.02.2022 um 15:42 schrieb Gregory Casamento <greg.casamento@gmail.com>:
>
> Here are the "raw" notes from yesterday's meeting...
> • Wolfgang email
> • libobjc2
> • PR for windows
> • exceptions not working.
> • fragility on other platforms.
> • linker dependencies
> • Xcode-lib
> • Put solution files into instructions. — Frederick Seiffert
> • Commit hook for @gnustep twitter account
> • GITHUB Action
> • build with clang
> • build .deb files.
> • build .rpm files.
> • NIGHTLY BUILD
> • RMS
> • Write about participation — pointless given the decision to move more toward LLVM/clang
I disagree here. Most likely the sentence after the hyphen is you personal opinion after the meeting. At lease during the two hours I attended nobody stated this. The idea here was to get in touch with the gcc developers over better support for libobjc2 from gcc (not stated in the protocol). And as you didn’t know who the current gcc maintainers are I suggested to last RMS on that point as he wrote he already spoke to them last year on that subject.
It really would help to keep personal opinions outside of the notes. Everybody who attended or didn’t attend may have differing views but the notes should somehow represent what was discussed during the meeting. Otherwise they are pointless.
You're correct. I added that after. I will go ahead and ping them about what we discussed. In the past we reviewed the notes at the end. I will do that next time. My apologies.
> • Phase ARC into core libraries — RFM
> • ROADMAP to move to clang if GCC is not up to spec
> • Reference implementation
> • VOID LINUX — Hugo
> • FRED TOPICS
> • Spring release — Mention on list
> • Updated Fred UBS