Re: Base 1.28.1 API/ABI break?

[Andreas Fink]

This is what I got while testing on the 4 main platforms. (ubuntu22 to follow 
soon)

Debian 11 amd64:                OK

Debian 11 arm64         failed
Failed test:     (2023-01-09 08:48:49.174 +0100)     general.m:37 ... 
-classNamed returns the correct class
Failed test:     (2023-01-09 08:48:49.175 +0100)   general.m:61 ... 
-principalClass returns TestClass for +bundleForClass:[TestClass class]

Debian 10 amd64         failed
Failed test:     (2023-01-09 08:48:36.765 +0100)     general.m:37 ... 
-classNamed returns the correct class
Failed test:     (2023-01-09 08:48:36.765 +0100)   general.m:61 ... 
-principalClass returns TestClass for +bundleForClass:[TestClass class]

Debian 10 arm64         failed
Failed set:        basic.m:9 ... problem in TLS support.
(this might be to build environment. Not sure what it could be. This one is 
built on a raspberry pi 4)

So it seems the  failed test for class names seems independent of architecture 
or Debian version which is rather puzzling...

> On 9 Jan 2023, at 08:28, Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 09.01.2023 um 07:58 schrieb Andreas Fink <afink@list.fink.org>:
>> 
>> I usually build packages for Debian 10 & 11 for amd64 and arm64
>> 
>> I have encountered make check returning an error on Debian11 arm64 but not 
>> on Debian 11 amd64
>> 
>> Built on Debian 11 intel:                    All OK!
>> Built on Debian 11 on arm64:         2 Failed tests
>> Failed test:     (2023-01-09 07:39:12.574 +0100)     general.m:37 ... 
>> -classNamed returns the correct class
>> Failed test:     (2023-01-09 07:39:12.576 +0100)   general.m:61 ... 
>> -principalClass returns TestClass for +bundleForClass:[TestClass class]
>> 
>> I'm surprised as this stuff is not really architecture specific usually.
>> 
> 
> Which version of libobjc are you building against and is it the same for both 
> architectures?