[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C# |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:55:13 -0400 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
> I did not discuss the protocol that the client uses for talking
> with the deamon. I think it is quite possible that HTTP may be
> suitable for this, and if it is suitable then I think we should
> use it and not create soemthing new.
>
I'm inclined to say here that either we use https, or use http as a
wrapper around an encrypted token set - or both (which would be
optimal)... That way, you're not transmitting sensitive information over
the net without ANY protection at all.
- Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, (continued)
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, David L. Nicol, 2001/07/23
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/26
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/21
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/26
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, miGlanz, 2001/07/22
Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, miGlanz, 2001/07/22