[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]IDE questions

From: Christoph Wille
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]IDE questions
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:32:29 +0100

At 11:20 AM 2/5/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Mr. Sugar mentioned correctly that every IDE makes proprietary projects
files, which is problem. What about idea to define in advance project file
format for DotGNU? I would suggest it to be XML based. If we define all tags
correctly, having in mind reasonable set of possible future needs, we could
achieve great advantage (under presumption that we do not change its
definition every now and then). We should make SharpDevelop to be ready IDE
in a time of DotGNU release. But, if someone wants to make KDevelop (IIRC
ver 3.0 should be not only C/C++ oriented) or Eclipse capable for editing
DotGNU projects, he will be able to do that easily. We would have then not
only multilatform tool, but mulitiIDE environment. I think that it could be
one nice feature that could be achieved without too much work. It's all on

SharpDevelop's project format is already XML-based (not only the projects, but all other configuration information too). Simply take a look at the generated .cmbx and .prjx files to see how we worked out the project structure.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]