dotgnu-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DotGNU]A plea for simplicity....


From: John
Subject: [DotGNU]A plea for simplicity....
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:18:31 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020815

Why not name it Atlas? Because I'd look at the name and say "Oh, ghu, another geophysical mapping data program" and be completely disappointed when I read the description, or worse downloaded it and installed it? That's assumning I came from a Western background where the name actually meant something, ie I knew who Atlas was and that he was responsible for holding the sky on his shoulders. There also the more modern connection to the Ayn Rand title, which might set some more provincial people back on their arses. I wouldn't be complaining about this so loudly except that I spent an hour on the Freshmeat trying to locate an application with a non-obvious name and a difficult to describe functionality. That search alone makes me ask rhetorically, "Can we please simplify this mess?"

This simplification is why Microsoft has such uncreative names for their products. They don't invent names for the most part. They want names that are instantly descriptive of what the programs do and though there are notable exceptions; Microsoft does, by and large, stick to a common word naming convention. Their mistake has been that they try to /trademark/ the name, and such trademarks are rather weak, precisely because of the common description aspect.

Perhaps DotGNU is in a different situation? We don't need to worry about a brand identity, because we're not likely to trademark our products, and thus I'd argue that the word most descriptive of the function works best? "DotGNU Balance" would be ideal. Instant communication of purpose without the need for knowledge of Western cultural motifs.

Truthfully though, I don't care. I'm just ranting. Call it "Post Hole Digger" for all it means to us. (Isuzu commercial reference)

John Le'Brecage

James Mc Parlane wrote:

Stargazer is an okay name, though I'm certain there are a few pieces of astronomy software by that name. If you're going to go for the obscure diety name approach suggested by Gopal: might I suggest Ma'at - the Egyptian weigher of souls, whose crest was the balance weighing a heart in one arm and a feather in the other? Why not Greek? Well, the Greek demi-diety of the balance, as I recall, is commonly called "Justice" and that's not a particularly interesting name, now'sit?

How about Atlas? :)

_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]