[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question

From: Gopal V
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:18:40 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, CH Gowri Kumar wrote:
> ILCoder--the function pointers are members of the structure and later
> intialize the function pointers to the actual functions.
> Just thought if we could have a base class with all the pure virtual
> functions and all the new coders derived from that.

Hmm... right now it makes lots of sense to use C because the rest of the
framework is in C :)

Every single bit of OO you add increases size , complexity and speed
penalties to the system. This idea is almost identical to OO , but 
without inheritance or constructors or base classes. Which is to say 
"virtually no overhead" :).

I totally mis-interpreted the "cscc" reference there and jumped the
gun on TreeCC :)

The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]