[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]C# documentation comments in pnetlib

From: Maciek
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]C# documentation comments in pnetlib
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:36:45 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Would Intel's OCL docs be of any use?

Rhys Weatherley wrote:

On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:22 am, Baron Schwartz wrote:

2) Are there any license issues?  Can we legally add similar or identical
documentation as exists in the MS .NET documentation?

As Stephen indicated, you must not look at the MS documentation or Rotor code while writing the comments, or legal issues may occur.

A lot of the core classes are already documented in the ECMA specifications, and we usually refer people to them if they need class library docs. Duplicating ECMA didn't seem very useful at the time.

But if you'd like to take this on (keeping the "don't look at MS" rule in mind), then that would be great.



Developers mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]