Re: [Pnet-developers] libjit licensing

[Aleksey Demakov]

Hi all,

On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Rhys Weatherley <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008 04:47, Aleksey Demakov wrote:
>
>  > So I would like to relicense libjit under LGPL v2 for the 0.1.2 release
>  > As far as I remember the last time we discussed it all the major
>  > contributors has already agreed on LGPL v2. Are there any abjections
>  > to this now?
>
>  You have my permission to change the Southern Storm Software, Pty Ltd
>  Copyright from GPL to LGPL v2.
>
>
>  > I think it would be more appropriate to talk about "LGPL v2.1 or later" for
>  > the library itself and to retain "GPL v2 or later" for the accompanying
>  > binaries.
>
>  I would probably prefer LGPL for all of it, just in case someone wanted to
>  move some of the binary code into the common library at some point in the
>  future.  The L in LGPL means "Lesser", not "Library", and can just as easily
>  apply to things that are not (as yet) libraries.  Having one license for the
>  entire code tree will make it easier.
>

All libjit code in CVS is now moved to LGPL v2.1. And I hope we will make
a release real soon now.

Regards,
Aleksey