[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dragora-users] Proposal: flexible script to create different images

From: Matías Fonzo
Subject: Re: [Dragora-users] Proposal: flexible script to create different images
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:33:35 -0300
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.5.2

El 2022-08-03 00:39, DustDFG escribió:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 5:24 PM Matías Fonzo <selk@dragora.org> wrote:
El 2022-08-02 00:57, DustDFG escribió:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:50 PM Matías Fonzo <selk@dragora.org> wrote:
>> [..]

If you want a minimal working system then that is
what I tried to discuss earlier.  Honestly, I don't see much
practicality in doing: ./bootstrap -s0 && ./bootstrap -s1 && ./bootstrap
-s2 ...

In this [1] message I explained why it can have sense. It is for
future stage M (Minimal) to reduce duplicates

[1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/dragora-users/2022-08/msg00008.html

> [1]

Perhaps it is seen as duplicative in relation to the process, where each process has its purpose, in this sense I do not see it as duplicative. In the hypothetical case of stage "M" or minimum, we still do not know what things can be duplicated with respect to what was used in the previous stages, in this respect I do not think it will be duplicated or many things will be used for it (according to what I proposed as "stage M"). You can also link to what is needed from one stage to another, in case they are files with the same instructions. However, my recommendation is to have separate files, even if there are small differences in the instructions.

Separating the stages as currently proposed, IMHO, is going to create confusion and a bit of fragmentation...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]