Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes

[Kenneth Loafman]

Try running with -v9, then posting the output, starting with the command
line through the end.  That will help me debug it.

...Ken

Stefan Hoth wrote:
> Thanks for the hint.
> 
> Unfortunattly there is now an error but I can't understand it.
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 400, in ?
>     if __name__ == "__main__": main()
>   File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 381, in main
>     if action == "restore": restore(col_stats)
>   File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 194, in restore
>     restore_get_patched_rop_iter(col_stats)):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 456, in Write_ROPaths
>     for ropath in rop_iter:
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 430, in integrate_patch_iters
>     for patch_seq in collated:
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 331, in yield_tuples
>     setrorps(overflow, elems)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 320, in setrorps
>     try: elems[i] = iter_list[i].next()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 78, in filter_path_iter
>     for path in path_iter:
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 91, in difftar2path_iter
>     tarinfo_list = [tar_iter.next()]
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 283, in next
>     if not self.tarfile: self.set_tarfile()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
> 278, in set_tarfile
>     self.current_fp = self.fileobj_iter.next()
>   File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 214, in get_fileobj_iter
>     backup_set.volume_name_dict[vol_num],
> KeyError: 1
> gpg: Error writing to `-': Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)
> gpg: handle plaintext failed: file write error
> 
> 
> I tried tp fetch 1 file from the backupdir and all I got was this.
> 
> - Stevie -
> 
> Kenneth Loafman schrieb:
>> Stefan Hoth wrote:
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>> My problem (maybe just in my understanding) is that I wanted to have the
>>> possibility to go back to an earlier state and fetch e.g. the etc/passwd
>>> from 2 weeks ago. But without these signatures I'm unable to get earlier
>>> file,am I?
>>>
>>> Maybe I just have got something wrong with the syntax for a filefetch
>>> with date provided. Would it be possible to give me an example for that
>>> so I can verify IF I have real problem?
>> Something like this should work:
>>
>> $ duplicity --include=/etc/passwd --restore-time=14d source-URL target
>>
>> See TIME FORMATS in the man page for more options on restore time.
>>
>> ...Ken

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature