emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#28336: closed ([PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "stat


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#28336: closed ([PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "static" output to glibc)
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:20:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:19:42 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#28336] [PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "static" output 
to glibc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #28336,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "static" output to glibc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
28336: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28336
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "static" output to glibc Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 14:32:03 +0200
Hello Guix!

This patch for ‘core-updates’ adds a “static” output to glibc, which
shaves 9 MiB out of it.

“glibc:static” is always part of the implicit inputs of
‘gnu-build-system’ though, such that building a statically-linked
package does not require any modification.

I’d like to apply it shortly if there are no issues.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (1):
  gnu: glibc: Add "static" output.

 gnu/packages/base.scm         | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 22 +++++++++++++++----
 gnu/packages/cross-base.scm   |  1 +
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.1




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#28336] [PATCH 0/1] core-updates: Add "static" output to glibc Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:19:42 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> skribis:

> This patch for ‘core-updates’ adds a “static” output to glibc, which
> shaves 9 MiB out of it.
>
> “glibc:static” is always part of the implicit inputs of
> ‘gnu-build-system’ though, such that building a statically-linked
> package does not require any modification.
>
> I’d like to apply it shortly if there are no issues.

Pushed as 6dff905e51202bbdebbad8811b6509584d12a796.

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]