emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#46668: closed ([PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#46668: closed ([PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports)
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:25:01 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:23:53 +0100
with message-id <871rcsk2bq.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#46668: [PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46668,
regarding [PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
46668: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46668
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:00:30 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.34.2
Hi Guix,

I encountered a ‘Cannot listen to port: is bound’ error
or something like that when testing some changes to the
substituter.  I'm not sure yet what the cause is, but this
patch should eliminate some potential trouble, by not
hard-coding ports in tests that require a temporary http
server, and instead automatically assigning a free port.

Greetings,
Maxime

Attachment: 0001-tests-do-not-hard-code-HTTP-ports.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#46668: [PATCH]: tests: do not hard code HTTP ports Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:23:53 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Hi Maxime,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

> On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 22:29 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> It’s a tad confusing that the second ‘with-http-server’ is now nested;
>> it shouldn’t change the semantics though, so it’s okay.
>> 
>> Anyway, you’re welcome to push to ‘master’ if “make check” agrees.  :-)
>
> I do not have commit access, and I haven't applied for commit access either,
> so you will have to push it yourself.

Oops, my bad; applied now, thanks!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]