bug#46784: closed ([PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:40:59 +0100
with message-id <87h7loimys.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46784,
regarding [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
46784: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46784
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:41:49 +0000
>
>
>
>
> * guix/licenses.scm (0bsd): New variable.
> ---
>  guix/import/utils.scm | 1 +
>  guix/licenses.scm     | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/guix/import/utils.scm b/guix/import/utils.scm
> index 2f5ccf7cea..09be1bf3dc 100644
> --- a/guix/import/utils.scm
> +++ b/guix/import/utils.scm
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ of the string VERSION is replaced by the symbol 'version."
>    ;; Please update guix/licenses.scm when modifying
>    ;; this list to avoid mismatches.
>    (match str
> +    ("0BSD"                        'license:0bsd)
>      ("AGPL-1.0"                    'license:agpl1)
>      ("AGPL-3.0"                    'license:agpl3)
>      ("Apache-1.1"                  'license:asl1.1)
> diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
> index 1091eee67c..34a94093df 100644
> --- a/guix/licenses.scm
> +++ b/guix/licenses.scm
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  (define-module (guix licenses)
>    #:use-module (srfi srfi-9)
>    #:export (license? license-name license-uri license-comment
> +            0bsd
>              agpl1 agpl3 agpl3+
>              apsl2
>              asl1.1 asl2.0
> @@ -124,6 +125,11 @@
>  ;;;
>  ;;; Code:
>  
> +(define 0bsd
> +  (license "Zero-Clause BSD"
> +           "https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html";
> +           "https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD";))
> +
>  (define agpl1
>    (license "AGPL 1"
>             "https://gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html";
> -- 
> 2.30.1
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:40:59 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> skribis:
>
> > Nicolas Goaziou 写道：
> >> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD
> >> is
> >> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd?
> >
> > I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested ‘bsd-0’ to Alex :-)
> > that accuracy is implied or valuable.  Guix maps ‘n-clause-BSD’ to
> > ‘bsd-n’, we get (marginally) fewer requests to add ‘missing’ licences,
> > all is well with the world.
> >
> > It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text;
> > that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence.  That requires 
> > claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is
> > a... certain kind of correct.
>
> This is an interesting discussion :-), but in the interest of moving
> forward, I applied the ‘bsd-0’ patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---