bug#48155: closed ([dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4] make check depends on SHELL)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 05 May 2021 00:05:09 -0500
with message-id <60922785.4070206@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#48155: [dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4] make check depends on SHELL
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #48155,
regarding [dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4] make check depends on SHELL
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
48155: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48155
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4] make check depends on SHELL
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 2 May 2021 17:50:25 +0900 (JST)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
> Tried dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4 on Solaris x86/x64 with many SHELLs & found
> make check fails with SHELL=/bin/csh,
> which does not occur with dejagnu-1.6.3-rc3.
> I know csh is not recommend, but still have to say something changed worse.
>
> $ uname -a
> SunOS hidden 5.11 11.3 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
>
> $ echo $SHELL
> /bin/sh
> $ ./configure CC=gcc
> $ make
> $ make check
>   :
>                 === runtest Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes            294
> DejaGnu version 1.6.3-rc4
> Expect version  5.45.4
> Tcl version     8.6
>
>
> On the other hand,
> $ SHELL=/bin/csh export SHELL
> $ ./configure CC=gcc
> $ make
> $ make check
>   :
>                 === runtest Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes            258
> # of unexpected failures        36
> DejaGnu version 1.6.3-rc4
> Expect version  5.45.4
> Tcl version     8.6
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --- Kiyoshi
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#48155: [dejagnu-1.6.3-rc4] make check depends on SHELL
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 05 May 2021 00:05:09 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090807 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0
>
>
>
>
> Kiyoshi KANAZAWA wrote:
> > Yes, error is produced.
> > [...]
> >   
>
> Good; I believe that the error adequately explains the problem, so I
> will mark this issue as resolved.  If you encounter further problems
> with this, or have a better way to describe the problem in the error
> message, feel free to continue to reply on this issue.  If you find
> other problems, please do not hesitate to report a new bug.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Jacob
>
> [oops:  previously sent to wrong address at the tracker]
>
>
> --- End Message ---